01 / AI load
Follow the electrical load.
Carry a pulsed demand profile through the transformer, UPS, cables and busbar. The worked scenario identifies a calculated capacity envelope of 32–38 racks.
Explore the electrical study ↗Infrastructure / Four engineering workflows
More compute.
What constrains the site?
Electrical capacity, cooling water, useful heat and neighbouring receptors all shape a data-center project. Archeion turns each question into a worked scenario, a comparison and the next input to obtain.
The project question
Which change
unlocks the next step?
A project can have sufficient nominal power and still face a limiting operating condition. The useful question is which requirement becomes binding under the actual demand, water balance, heat-use conditions or noise scenario.
These four completed workflows keep their individual inputs and assumptions visible. They provide a basis for project-specific investigation and comparison.
02 / Cooling water
Compare the cooling choices.
Relate demand, storage and territorial constraints. In the worked scenario, a 2,700 m³ storage option covers the calculated crisis balance.
Explore the water study ↗03 / Heat recovery
Find a useful heat destination.
Connect source temperature, demand and economic assumptions. Establish what the receiving user and the site must provide for a recovery option to make sense.
Explore the heat study ↗04 / Noise
Target the decisive measurement.
Compare the night-time scenario with the acoustic requirement. Identify the measurement or mitigation option that would change the decision.
Explore the acoustic study ↗Study scope
These are four distinct worked infrastructure cases, including synthetic inputs. They are not presented as one calibrated model of an operating data center. Each linked study explains its inputs, method and decision boundary. Project-specific conclusions require the corresponding site data.